Light & Shadow

I’m nearly ten years into my ‘serious’ photography journey. I’ve photographed pretty much every style of subject in many different locations. I have taken tens of thousands of photographs, maybe half of one percent, worth keeping or at least ones which I am proud of.

I don’t know if this hit rate is unusual but all the while, I’ve been searching for a distinctive style. I want people to look at my work and instantly recognise it. A distinctive look that my photos take. The one constant quest in my work is to examine the relationship between light and shadow.

I enjoy the work of street photographers such as Sean Tucker, Samuel Lintaro, Roman Fox and Faizal Westcott ; who all maximise the use of shadows, strong patches of sunlight and people moving through these spaces. I went into Manchester last week and made the most of the sunshine by finding spots where it partially lit up the scene. Im still learning the techniques involved with making strong images but I do use the highlight weighted metering mode on my Sony cameras. It’s a fairly common metering mode on most makes but the Sony one helps me to produce a certain look that I’m after.

The light gods do have to bless you in order to achieve this style but when they do, you need to work the scene quickly and with intent. I like people or interesting objects to be in the light or people passing through. I’m not worried if others in the scene just come out as black shapes because it helps the viewer to concentrate on the detail in the lighter spaces. The three pillars of photography to my mind are light, composition and time. I am far from the finished article when it comes to all three but I have learned and improved my understanding of all of them in the last ten years. I now take photos intentionally rather than in hope. I compose a scene and wait for something or someone to walk into it. In the case of the image above, the man eating a snack was stood for a while but I had to wait for him to be isolated rather than behind passers by.

The image above has elements of light and shadow created entirely by the shape of the building. The geometric patterns of the building look fabulous against the blue sky ( if you look carefully, there’s an airliner flying above) and shows you don’t need to be on the street waiting for someone to walk through a patch of light to make a good photo. The legendary British photographer Martin Parr has said that you need to find a subject that interests enough to want to explore more and more. My landscape photography works best for me when I have dramatic skies or strong light on parts of it. I struggle with landscape photography because I think people like landscapes and they are less challenging than street or documentary photography. I’m drawn to the coast because it has texture, light and drama. I just don’t think I’m much of a landscape photographer and I admire those who create beautiful images in nature. It’s just not my main interest and I need to accept that.

I can’t conclusively say my style is distinctive, that is for others to determine. I know I haven’t perfected it by any stretch of imagination but I am getting there. The one thing that those who see my work like is my moody look to my images. I like to create a bit drama, to make the everyday seem a little more interesting.

On another topic, I find myself getting a little frustrated with some photographers on YouTube who tell you that ‘gear doesn't matter’. I am no beginner and have been at this for a while now. I sell my work, have had my work featured in magazines and do studio photo shoots and gear does matter. The fact I’ve been through pretty much every camera brand to end up where I started with Sony. Why did I switch from Nikon Z to Sony? The cameras are as small as full frame cameras get, they have an extensive range of native and third party lenses available and they just work. They aren’t aesthetically the prettiest, they don’t go for retro or sleek. They are purely functional but very good at that. I enjoy shooting with them because they don’t get in the way of my composition or execution.

Often these photographers shoot with the top of the range camera bodies and lenses, get gear sent to them and are sponsored to make their videos.

I don’t begrudge them these factors in any way. They are very experienced professionals who have worked their socks off to get where they are. They provide useful information for those wanting to upgrade or switch gear; and I know it isn’t their intention to make you go out and buy the same in the hope of you being as good as them, because it doesn’t make you a better photographer. I do however reserve the right to have gear that is slightly more than I need for the essentials and allows me to be even more creative. I have traded my way to my present set up and don’t plan on switching because I’ve been there and got several t shirts to prove it.

Inspirational Landscapes

What inspires a creative person ?

Speaking as a photographer, there are many things that move me to take a photo. Light, shapes, human interactions and landscapes. Sometimes, a change of scenery will excite me to want to capture moments which is ultimately what we do as photographers.

My partner and I came back yesterday from a weeks break in Anglesey, North Wales. I was brought up holidaying in the Lake District primarily and only venturing into Wales once or twice. We never visited Anglesey in my memory although I’m told I went with my parents as a very young child. Snowdonia was not on our radar for some reason. My partner on the other hand is far more familiar with Wales and since we met 9 years ago, we’ve been there several times. Anglesey is an enchanting island with fabulous beaches, awe inspiring cliffs and amazing lighthouses on rocky promontories. The interior of the island is generally flat agricultural land but it’s the coast that brings the island to life. Its proximity to Snowdonia is very handy too. The image above is of Carnedd Llewelyn, a substantial mountain in the Ogwen Valley. The light changed every few seconds, bringing its own drama to the majesty of the mountain.

South Stack Lighthouse on the north west coast of Anglesey is a jaw dropping location for photographers. The 91ft high tower is dwarfed by the 300ft cliffs next to it. We have visited this place before but you get a greater sense of scale from this angle at Ellin’s Tower, a 19th century folly built as a summer house for the wealthy Stanley family from Penrhos.

All the while we were staying on the island and at our AirBnb, I struggled with my existing camera gear and what I should do. The minute I began taking photos wherever we went, those dilemmas vanished. My Nikon Z7ii behaved superbly, rendered some great photos and never once got in the way of my getting the best shot. I have two Nikon bodies and a few lenses plus the magical Ricoh GRIII X. I kept thinking, should I switch systems and have one mirrorless interchangeable lens body and a small selection of lenses instead of two. Sony would be the only move for me as they have a greater selection of lenses but then I edited the images from the Nikon and this dilemma diminished. I realised whilst out taking photos, I didn’t once consider the gear and concentrated on the composition and the moment. The camera didn’t get in the way of the creative process. It was a machine doing what I wanted it to, efficiently and with very little fuss.

The photographer and YouTuber James Popsys, describes his Sony A7RV as boring, because it does the job without any drama or complications. It is a very good camera in the same way as my Nikon Z7ii, more megapixels than either of us would ever need, top notch lenses and the ability to execute any action without a hint of difficulty.

Most artists, creators choose their tools on the basis of how well they perform not how they look. Photography is strewn with fashionable, highly priced, vintage inspired gear. We are fed the line that having a cool looking camera or one with great history and caché matters. There are those who buy into a system and then spend at least 50% of the time convincing you their choice is the right one. I arrived at where I am now by falling for the look a camera, the label rather than the ability to help me create really good images. I am not a Nikon fanboy but they do the job really well. I am sure equally, Sony would be great as would Canon but this is the system I’ve invested in and it helps me do what I need.

The takeaway from last week was an appreciation of some beautiful landscapes, amazing sunrises and a real feeling of relaxation. I enjoyed taking my photos because the location and the company were the main inspirations not how retro or fashionable my camera looked. I can shoot with the Nikon or Ricoh bodies and no one gives me a second look. They are like assassins, stealthy and effective. They allow me to love what’s in front of the lens and not fixate over what’s attached to it. I don’t doubt Leica or Hasselblad cameras are capable of producing brilliant photos but they aren’t so far advanced of mine purely based on the their street cred. I’m sure if Hasselblad came a knocking and offered me and X1D II and a couple of lenses, I would be more than happy but in the mean time, I’ll stick with enjoying the landscape, the street scene, the moment. They are what matters, not the gear.

In Awe

I recently did a post about unpopular camera brands where I made the case for those that went under the radar of some photographers. The big beasts of camera technology these days are Sony, Canon and Nikon. They dominate the professional world, making gear that is used the world over to produce much of our photographic content. They have all focused their attentions on mirrorless camera systems and are gradually leaving the DSLR behind. It is amazing to see how technology has moved on in the 10 years since the camera I am focusing on was introduced.

The Nikon D750 is a 24.3mp full frame DSLR introduced in 2014. It was seen as the prosumer model below the flagship D4 and D810. A good friend of mine and professional photographer Andrew Fowler, is a long time Nikon user. He owns this model and always rated it.

I have used pretty much every major camera brand apart from Nikon over the years. In the last 2 years, I have grown to enjoy using the ‘older’ technology of the DSLR . The optical viewfinder, the better ergonomics, the lightning fast start up time and of course, what some are capable of. This camera however has blown me away. It is the most comfortable, reliable, rugged camera I’ve ever used. It produces some of the nicest files I’ve ever seen. The detail it retains is amazing. The battery life is the best of any camera I have owned. The native lenses are superb and not expensive. It isn’t overly big and bulky. The grip is deep and moulds to my hand.

I bet you think you’ve heard this from me before. In fairness , I do tend to say this sort of thing ; but ‘sort of’ is the operative phrase as I’m trying to convince myself a purchase has been worth it! This Nikon was comparatively inexpensive and isn’t all sparkling new.

I have heard and read that camera technology has in some ways, advanced dramatically in the last 15 years and in many ways it hasn’t. A top of the line camera in 2010 is still a great camera if it takes great pictures and is reliable. It is around the edges that cameras have advanced. They make your life slightly easier as a technician but don’t dismiss the older models as they have something to offer. If I had been with Nikon for the long haul , maybe I would have seen how newer models improved the shooting experience and image quality. I had a moment the other week whilst using the D750. I was taking a few sunset photos , last of the light shots up at a reservoir high up on the top of the moors. I finished and put my camera back in the bag and said to myself “I really love using this” . That is a first for me.

I’ve come to realise that camera body aesthetics don’t really count for much. I owned a Leica once and felt conscious that if I was out taking photos, people were looking at my camera rather than what I was looking at. That didn’t make my photography better, it just drew attention to the gear I was carrying. No one looks at a 10 year old DSLR because they think it’s yesterday’s technology. Taking thousands of images and learning from that experience, makes me a better photographer. Practice and time improves your photography. Having a camera that can realise my expectations is important but having one that exceeds them is a gift.

I am doing more photo shoots using my Panasonic S5II but I will also be using the Nikon as it may offer a little of the magic I’ve discovered in my general landscape and documentary work. I am told, combined with the 85mm f1.8 g lens, it is a great camera for portrait work. I know it’s excellent in low light and its colours are great. In conclusion, don’t write off older technology. They knew a thing or two about making professional equipment back in the day. Would I recommend a D750 ? Yes of course I would. Would I try the D780 or D850? Yes I would but do I need more bells and whistles ? Not really no. I am though, in a state of awe.

Unpopular Camera Brands

Lupin - Pentax K70 + Pentax 135mm f3.5

Reputation in the world of cameras, is a strange thing. It can build from having been a quality producer/manufacturer for generations. It can come from famous people endorsing the brand. It can come from a sense of self belief. You can however make top quality products that can equal or some times, out perform the popular ones and this goes unnoticed.

If you are a camera manufacturer, particularly one of the big three (Sony, Canon & Nikon), you appear to fail to see what any other camera brand is doing. You work at your own pace, introducing new cameras and lenses at your own speed. You endeavour to make the best product you can to appeal to your loyal fanbases.

The second tier of brands (Fujifilm, Panasonic, OM systems (Olympus), Sigma and Pentax) have to work harder to get the attention of professionals and enthusiasts. They have to show it’s feasible to switch from the big three and trust their products.

Then there are the top end manufacturers (Leica and Hasselblad) who produce high end very expensive and exclusive cameras and lenses. They can charge exorbitant prices for their products as they are hand made and carry a certain caché that commands a high fee.

Old Town above Hebden Bridge - Panasonic S5II + Pentax 28mm f2.8

Certain YouTubers, poke fun at the second tier manufacturers attempts to sell their cameras and lenses. It’s as if they have to compare themselves to the output of the big three in order to gain some degree of approval. They compare the latest camera or lens with one from the high three and ask you to wonder if it is as good as a Canon/Nikon/Sony equivalent. You have to match their standards otherwise, they don’t quite reach their lofty heights. Don’t get me wrong, the big three make some really beautiful cameras and lenses. They sort of deserve their positions as the go to brands but is it all smoke and mirrors? I have tried cameras from pretty much every main brand apart from Nikon. For a long time, I was a Fujifilm user and loved their quality cameras and lenses. I have used Sony, Canon, Leica, Panasonic, Olympus (briefly) and Pentax. I now shoot with Panasonic and Pentax. They do everything I need them to and are both more than able of producing top rate images to the limit of my capabilities (who sometimes makes a mess of things).

Nutclough Woods, Hebden Bridge Pentax K70 + Pentax 50mm f1.7

At one time, Pentax were probably the leading camera manufacturers in the world. Their cameras and lenses were the envy of most other brands. Nowadays, they occupy a corner of the camera market usually in the shade. They do however, continue to make top built, rugged, feature packed cameras. Their lenses render colour and detail beautifully and they have the added advantage of being backwards compatible with their lens mount. You can attach a Pentax mount lens from the 1970s to their modern bodies without an adapter. I think the only other brand that boasts that is Leica but correct if I’m wrong.

Panasonic Lumix make stunning, weather sealed cameras that out perform some of the big three as hybrid cameras. They are well known for their ability to make excellent video cameras. As stills cameras, they are criminally underrated. Some of my favourite shots were taken on Lumix cameras. They do the simple things well and make highly capable cameras and stunning glass.

Rochdale Canal - Panasonic S5 + Panasonic 50mm f1.8

However much you point out the excellent build quality, the feature packed camera bodies and lenses and the manufacturers desire to listen to its customers, the big three will always hog the limelight because that’s how they keep there. Ricoh Pentax , Fujifilm and Panasonic LUMIX tend to listen to users and introduce features that photographers have asked for. I’m not sure that any of the big three ever do this. They tend to approach photographers as customers who should be happy to receive whatever new innovations they have come up with and just be grateful for what they’ve got.

Quick Break Haifax - Panasonic S5II + Panasonic 85mm f1.8

I have ended up happily using two stellar cameras from Pentax and Panasonic. I don’t feel as if I’ve compromised in any way on quality by going with these cameras. I never felt as if Fujifilm were the poor relations of Sony/Canon/Nikon. Now I’m in the business of taking photographs professionally, I wonder if the camera I choose dictates my ability to work as a professional photographer? Results are ultimately what gets you work and I am trying to focus on honing my craft rather than what tool I use to perform in the craft. I use 40 yr old lenses that stand up to the latest and greatest advances in lens technology. I see this as a bonus afforded to me that the major players would sniff at. Would I like to own a top of line Sony camera or Nikon, maybe so? Until that day comes, I say give the also ran guys a chance. You may be pleasantly surprised!

Mirror Or Not?

I’m an experienced chop and change merchant. I have extensive knowledge and experience of switching camera brands and systems. The only digital format I haven’t tried is medium format and that’s mainly because I can’t afford to. If someone gave me £10,000 to buy a camera system, I would seriously contemplate medium format. As it is, my budget is very limited. I rely on selling and trading to get the gear I use. About four months ago, I moved to Canon DSLR from micro four thirds Panasonicville. I wanted to rekindle a love of DSLR cameras and how they work. The Canon native glass is top notch, even the budget end 50mm f1.8 and 40mm f2.8. The autofocus and shutter systems are very quick. They don’t have IBIS but a few of the lenses have OIS so it’s there if you need to steady things.

I have spent the time since, using DSLR’s and mainly, loving them. There are a few drawbacks but on the whole, the shooting experience is very satisfying. I have mainly used mirrorless cameras in the past as I like to occasionally use vintage film lenses but the disadvantages of mirrorless are rarely talked about. The battery life is invariably worse, the start up time is slower and autofocus isn’t always as quick as with DSLRs. The camera world is nearly all mirrorless nowadays and the major brands (Canon and Nikon), have ceased to bring out new DSLR models or lenses. Everything is mirrorless with both having to create a whole new line of lenses to suit new mounts.

I recently sold one of my DSLR bodies to get a Canon EOS R mirrorless camera. It was the first full frame model Canon brought out and is a great starting point for them. it has its drawbacks but every camera I have ever owned had them. My dalliance with Leica full frame was great but not without its woes. I wanted to stay with Canon and have the ability (with an adapter), to use my existing EF glass. It connects flawlessly and works very well on the EOS R. Yes, the old problems with mirrorless are present on the EOS R but on the whole, I really like using it. I do think Canon have the best menu system of any manufacturer I have tried and it crosses over from DSLR to mirrorless, without missing a step.

My two camera system is now a Canon 6D Mark II and the EOS R. They are both lovely to use and similar in the quality of image they produce. I can’t decide as to which I will use for video work as the specs are similar. I have shied away
from looking at the R6, R5 or R6 II, as I’m not entirely sure I need IBIS as yet. Is the DSLR a dying breed of camera, probably? Are they irrelevant to today's photographers, no. The flagship Canon 1DX Mark III is an astonishing camera, that can often outperform most of the current Canon mirrorless cameras. It is far tougher and has a massive shutter life expectancy.

I know I have done these sort of gear centered reviews before and then gone and switched. I’m not telling you to go Canon or that I love them like no other. I haven’t ever explored the mysterious world of Sony full frame and there may come a day when I do. I do think using DSLR’s, is a very joyful thing and they are capable of producing stunning images, despite their ageing technology. As mentioned earlier, I do use old film lenses on occasions and we are talking 40-50 year old lenses. The images you can capture with these can be as good as any modern lens. Many filmmakers use vintage glass as they produce a more ‘filmic look’. Sharpness and precision are nice but not the be all and end all. Just because your camera is older than five years and may have a mirror, it doesn’t render it obsolete. Maybe there is a place for the continuance of DSLRs ? Maybe to harness what they do really well with what a modern mirrorless camera can achieve, is the way forward?

Pentaxia

‘Oh right, he’s switched systems, again’. Yeah I hear you thinking this guy can’t stick with one thing. He must be frustrated or believes a new camera will make him a better photographer. Don’t think I haven’t thought this many times over the years. Searching for that perfect system that helps me deliver what I see in that split second before taking the shot. Have I been masking my inner dissatisfaction, am I chopping and changing to make me feel better?

I have moved over to the niche world of Pentax. Once, a titan in the world of photography, a technical innovator of such things as the SLR, new lens construction, championing the use of 35mm film. Pentax have resisted the move towards mirrorless, preferring to stick to producing DSLR cameras (mostly APSC format). In 2016, whether it was pressure to take on Canon and Nikon ; they introduced the Pentax K1. A 36.4mp full frame DSLR with IBIS , pixel shift technology, astrotracer ability; they entered the competitive professional camera market. It is fair to say, I have had my eye on this camera for about 2 years. I’ve been through the Fujifilm system, had a six month dalliance with the Panasonic/Leica L mount to arrive at where I am today.

Took delivery of my new used Pentax K1 last week. It was made in 2017 according to its serial number but doesn’t feel outdated. It’s heavy but very comfortable. Solid, precise and very well made. There were two main reasons I took the leap into Pentax. Firstly, I already own and use the Ricoh GRIIIX. That is a stellar camera with outstanding image quality and the partner company of Pentax. My K1 shares the same image processor as the Ricoh. Secondly, Pentax DSLR cameras are backwards compatible with every K mount lens right back to the 1970s. I have owned several vintage k mount lenses and to have a camera that doesn’t require adapters is a bonus.

Pentax users are described as Pentaxians. They inhabit a world at odds with the conventions of modern digital photography. These woolly coated creatures of middle earth, scuttle about in woods carrying their frankly weird cameras with them. What the big players often overlook however , is the amazing image quality Pentax cameras can deliver. My friend Baldur who now lives in Norway, is a Pentax user. He’s one of the best photographers I’ve met and his choice of camera has never seemed to hold his creativity back. It got me thinking a month or so ago, what if Baldur had a point about Pentax cameras? Like most camera gear lurches, I do a lot of background research as to what I’m getting into. The K1 has sat in the background, tantalising me with its beguiling qualities. I realised that if I was to move into this system, it would require some new learning. I have been such a confirmed mirrorless users for so many years now, it would take a big leap to go to a DSLR. I’ve leapt and what are my first impressions?

Image quality is beyond anything I’ve ever used. The detail, the ability to recover that detail is jaw dropping. The files are bigger so you can now crop and not lose quality. The lens choices are numerous. I started off with two old Sigma lenses. I didn’t have high hopes but they perform beautifully. My old vintage glass is wonderful on it and it confirms my choice. It isn’t that heavy but it is that quality you want in any camera. You just want to take it out of the your bag and take pictures. All the images in this post have been taken with my K1. Am I finally settled on a camera system? There’s no point saying definitively yes but is it the best system I’ve ever used? Probably yes. I have now entered the realm of Pentaxia. I shall be monitoring my feet for excessive hair growth and am ordering some long pipes to sit and blow smoke rings quietly of an evening in a hidden wood or scenic hillside.