One Camera - Maybe More Than One Lens?

New Year, new challenges. If I’m honest, I feel as if my photography has been a bit stuck of late. It’s not that I’m unhappy with the results but just that it isn’t progressing as upwardly as I would like. You often imagine that progress is gradual but consistent state. I realise from the benefit or misfortune of being nearly 60, that life very rarely goes in an upwardly straight projection. My kit is absolutely perfect for my photography. I have a small collection of stellar lenses and two brilliant hybrid camera bodies so I do not excuse myself on account of not being ably equipped. I had my first exhibition last September which went very well. I launched my website around the same time and am fairly pleased with the look and function of it. I have asked others who are in both photography and the creative arts as to how I could structure my website to increase traffic and sales of prints. I now have an idea as to how I can do this.

I’m also pleased with how my photographs are turning out. I see a shift in style and mood with my recent work and like how this shows some progression. The title of the post is however related to the challenge that is popular with many photographers ; namely the ‘One Camera, One Lens’. The principle behind this is to focus the photographer on improving their composition skills by requiring them work the scene more. Having a fixed focal length can be seen as a hindrance by some. Conversely, having a single focal length makes the photographer look at the scene more critically and maybe focus aspects of it rather than trying include everything in it. One of my favourite You Tube channels is that of James Popsys. He talks in one of his videos about the best advice he was given when starting out in Photography. He was told by a very experienced landscape photographer, to think of a scene as a jigsaw. To not look at the entirety of the scene as a completed one but to decide whether the component parts of that scene work sufficiently well to produce a coherent image. Having a single focal length can enable the photographer to concentrate on maybe one or two elements by virtue of the self imposed restrictions placed upon them. I do sometimes think my images can be too busy, too many elements. The skill of an artist can often be what you leave out rather than include.

I do however have a problem with using just one lens. I see why it is a good exercise but I also see the merits of having two ways of approaching a scene by using two focal lengths. I have sufficient experience to know that using one lens in certain circumstances, can be a bit like cutting your nose off to spite your face. I have two excellent Leica/Panasonic collaboration prime lenses - a 25mm f1.4 and 15mm f1.7. These give you the full frame equivalent focal lengths of 50 and 30mm respectively. The wider lens allows more of the scene to be included whereas the longer focal length is a standard length. The wider lens enables the photographer to give more context to the subject even if the shot includes maybe too many elements. The skill in this case is to manage how you contain the number of elements while increasing the context. The longer focal length reduces the extent of the scene but enables the focus to be specific. 50mm is not an uncommon focal length for portrait work which does allow a little scene to appear. In truth, I like both focal lengths. I may only take out one of those lenses as part of a two or three lens kit. This doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy using the other but I make a determination as to what the particular assignment requires.

In short, I do think it a worthwhile challenge but I am not a sufficiently experienced professional photographer, to artificially restrict my workflow by choosing only one focal length. For instance, yesterday, every shot I took on my Panasonic GH5ii was with the 35-100mm f2.8 lens. They were either at 35 or 100. I chose that lens because the images I wanted required that flexibility. I was very happy with the results and enjoyed working the compositions using that one lens. If I had used just 25mm lens, I would not have been able to get the images I specifically wanted. One day when i’m rich and famous, I will spend a year shooting exclusively with my Leica rangefinder and the best 50mm Leica lens I can afford. I will justify it as a need to return to improving compositions skills. Until that day, I still need the options my excellent kit allow me!

Ricoh Magic.

Gt George Street, Leeds - Ricoh GRIII

There are days when you feel like you have the perfect tool for the job. Sometimes, the perfect tool isn’t an interchangeable lens camera with a selection of lenses. Sometimes, it’s a tiny pocket camera with no viewfinder and no tilty/flippy screen. You compose and shoot; it’s as easy as that. I’m talking about the Ricoh GRIII. It has a reputation as a formidable street photography camera. It has a very clever focusing system that instantly captures moments unlike many other cameras. It’s useable with one hand as all the controls are accessible and designed to be operated one handed.

Handrail at the Piecehall, Halifax - Ricoh GRIII.

It has a macro capability that can produce very detailed close ups (see above image) which you do have to remember to switch off when you try to shoot a more general shot! I love it. I love it’s ability to capture razor sharp images with little or no fuss. You need to spend a little time setting it up to suit your needs but once you have, it’s a super powered point and shoot that’s in a different league to others. I’ve looked at images taken using the Leica Q cameras and as stunning as they can be, the Ricoh is a match. It has the same 28mm focal length as a Leica Q albeit in an APSC sensor (18.5 mm). The lens barely protrudes from the tiny body and has a very quick start up time. The downside of the camera is the battery life which is pretty poor. That however is the only downside. I normally shoot using Fujifilm cameras and lenses but I’ve started to mix and match a bit. I’m now using Sigma lenses and a stunning Mitakon Speedmaster manual lens. I’m really impressed with the Sigma lenses, they match and almost surpass the Fujifilm equivalents but in much smaller packages. I’m looking also to get myself an old Canon 5D MkII with just one 50mm lens because I’ve always wanted a full frame camera. I realise there are alternatives to just one manufacturer, much as I love Fujifilm gear.

Leeds Town Hall - Ricoh GRIII

The limitations of a fixed focal length can also be an advantage. You are forced to work a composition more because of the restriction of that view. You can include people in your street photography but you have to be braver than I am. I like to have people walk through the composition rather than be the subject. They are almost incidental. I’m not the most confident photographer when it comes to street work. The Ricoh does however capture people beautifully even if they are small in the larger image. The famous photographer Chase Jarvis once said “the best camera is the one that's with you” and he has a point. The Ricoh GRIII is that camera. It makes it easy for you owing to its size and functionality but ultimately, the image quality is its most attractive feature. If you’ve never tried one, give it a go. Test one, borrow one and if you’re in the position to, buy one. You won’t be disappointed, in fact I’d go as far to say, you will be captivated.

Oxenhope Moor - Ricoh GRIII